|
Top Management's commitment to Quality & Academic Leadership: 100 points |
|
A. 50 points for Chairman of the Trust
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Qualifications for the role
being performed |
|
√ |
|
|
|
2. |
Academic Commitment |
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Perceived will to excel and
sincerity of purpose |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Perceived concern for faculty development |
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Vision and direct involvement in realization of that vision |
√ |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Involvement with quality
improvement process directly |
√ |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Attitude towards faculty & staff |
|
√ |
|
|
|
8. |
Attitude towards students |
|
√ |
|
|
|
9. |
Academic autonomy to faculty and open-mindedness towards suggestions |
|
√ |
|
|
|
10. |
Inspirational quality of leadership/Role model for excellence |
√ |
|
|
|
|
B. 50 points for Director/ Principal
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Qualifications for the role being performed |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Academic Commitment |
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Perceived will to excel and sincerity of purpose |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Perceived concern for faculty development |
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Vision and direct involvement in realization of that vision |
√ |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Involvement with quality improvement process directly |
√ |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Attitude towards faculty & staff |
√ |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Attitude towards students |
|
√ |
|
|
|
9. |
Academic autonomy to
faculty and open-
mindedness towards
suggestions |
|
√ |
|
|
|
10. |
Inspirational quality of
leadership/Role model for
excellence |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Human (Faculty) Resource Development & Management: 50 points |
|
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Recruitment process leading to excellence |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Financial compensation package/process |
|
√ |
|
|
|
3. |
Perks and performance incentives |
|
√ |
|
|
|
4. |
People development process- encouragement to improve qualifications |
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Work culture |
√ |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Faculty & Staff performance appraisal process |
√ |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Networking with reputed academic institutions- encouragement & support |
√ |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Ambience in offices of faculty & staff |
|
√ |
|
|
|
9. |
Encouragement for industry interaction |
|
√ |
|
|
|
10. |
Skill-up gradation I
conference Sponsorship and peer interaction
encouragement |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Quality Policy & Strategy : 50 points |
|
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Quality policy on student admissions |
|
√ |
|
|
|
2. |
Quality policy on faculty
recruitment process |
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Quality policy on faculty
promotion/recognition
process |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Student orientation |
|
√ |
|
|
|
5. |
Industry (employer) orientation |
|
√ |
|
|
|
6. |
Quality of physical ambience |
√ |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Quality improvement policy for faculty & staff |
√ |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Vision I Mission leading to
quality |
√ |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Core values leading to
quality of education |
√ |
|
|
|
|
10. |
Quality Management
Systems-ISO etc in place |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Academic Resources : 100 points |
|
(a) Library Resources: 20 points
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Number and quality of books |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Number and quality of journals |
|
√ |
|
|
|
3. |
Library ambience I
computerization etc |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Adequacy & attitude of library staff |
√ |
|
|
|
|
(b) Computational Resources: 20 points
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Number of computers per student |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Networking quality / LAN etc |
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Access timings & % availability of computers |
|
√ |
|
|
|
4. |
Degree of modernization of computational facilities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
(c) Internet Connectivity: 10 points
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Bandwidth, keeping size in
mind / campus networking |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Availability of online-
journals / learning resources |
|
√ |
|
|
|
(d) Laboratories Infrastructure: 25 points
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Adequacy in terms of
number of labs required for
the programmes. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Adequacy in terms of
equipment / facilities
required |
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Availability of technical support (manpower) relevant to the lab |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
General ambience & upkeep of equipment and space |
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Availability of laboratory Manuals and other instructional resources |
|
√ |
|
|
|
(e) Lecture-Hall Infrastructure: 25 points
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Adequacy of lecture halls
with respect to students
strength |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Quality and ambience in
lecture halls-lighting,
furniture etc |
|
√ |
|
|
|
3. |
Educational technology / multi media and other facilities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Tutorial rooms / project rooms availability |
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Auditorium for special lectures, industry lectures, Training & Placement activity etc |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Academic Processes : 100 points |
|
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
|
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Effectiveness of teaching-
learning process-in terms of
class size |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Tutorial process-size of
tutorial groups &
effectiveness |
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Laboratory process-size,
mechanism of report writing & interaction with instructor |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Process of lecture delivery / focus on learning and
interaction |
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Industry-interaction process |
|
√ |
|
|
|
6. |
Process of projects allocation and guidance |
|
√ |
|
|
|
7. |
Evaluation process for sessionals / labs |
√ |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Practical orientation |
|
√ |
|
|
|
9. |
Process for allocating
summer training |
|
√ |
|
|
|
10. |
Process to enhance
communication skills |
|
√ |
|
|
|
11. |
Process to improve social skills |
|
|
√ |
|
|
12. |
Personality development process |
|
√ |
|
|
|
13. |
Process for value orientation |
|
√ |
|
|
|
14. |
Sports orientation and facilities |
|
√ |
|
|
|
15. |
Support towards Technical- symposia/ festivals |
√ |
|
|
|
|
16. |
Networking with academia in India/abroad |
|
√ |
|
|
|
17. |
Discipline |
|
√ |
|
|
|
18. |
Academic schedule
regularity |
√ |
|
|
|
|
19. |
Grievance handling process with respect to students admissions |
√ |
|
|
|
|
20. |
Grievance handling process with respect to students results |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Faculty and Staff Satisfaction : 100 points (Conduct Surveys) |
|
Rate Faculty and Staff Satisfaction on following factors on a 5 points scale
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
A. |
Hygiene factors:
satisfaction level: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Pay |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Perks |
|
√ |
|
|
|
3. |
Promotional avenues |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Physical working conditions |
|
√ |
|
|
|
5. |
Workload-Academic |
√ |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Workload-Non Academic |
√ |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Housing on campus/or allowances |
√ |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Transport allowance / facilities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Locational convenience |
√ |
|
|
|
|
10. |
Safety / security on campus |
|
√ |
|
|
|
B. |
Motivational factors:
satisfaction level: |
11. |
Career advancements /
opportunities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
12. |
Self Esteem / perceived
respect in the organization |
√ |
|
|
|
|
13. |
Fairness in recognitions |
√ |
|
|
|
|
14. |
Class room academic
challenges |
|
√ |
|
|
|
15. |
Professional & peer
interaction |
√ |
|
|
|
|
16. |
Research facilities available |
|
|
√ |
|
|
17. |
Consulting opportunities |
|
√ |
|
|
|
18. |
Nurturing of talent for academic growth by the institution |
|
√ |
|
|
|
19. |
Conference support given |
√ |
|
|
|
|
20. |
Autonomy for professional growth |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Student Satisfaction : 100 points |
|
(To be based on surveys and feedbacks)
Sl. |
Sub factors |
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
No. |
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
A. |
Hygiene factors:
satisfaction level: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Lecture facilities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Library facilities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Project facilities/quality of guidance |
|
√ |
|
|
|
4. |
Tutorial help |
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Computational facilities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Sports facilities |
|
√ |
|
|
|
7. |
Medical help/support |
√ |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Sanitation / Housekeeping |
√ |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Maintenance of buildings |
|
√ |
|
|
|
10. |
Cafeteria / Canteen |
|
√ |
|
|
|
B. |
Motivational factors:
satisfaction level: |
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
Teaching effectiveness |
|
√ |
|
|
|
12. |
Fairness in evaluation |
|
√ |
|
|
|
13. |
Intellectual learning environment |
|
√ |
|
|
|
14. |
Summer projects quality |
|
√ |
|
|
|
15. |
Industrial interaction |
|
√ |
|
|
|
16. |
Placement levels |
|
√ |
|
|
|
17. |
Creative pursuits |
√ |
|
|
|
|
18. |
Co-curricular activities |
√ |
|
|
|
|
19. |
Support by Administration |
|
√ |
|
|
|
20. |
Inspirational academic leadership, teachers and staff |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Impact on Society : 50 points |
|
(Based on feedback, databases on following 10 factors)
Sl. |
Sub factors |
|
|
Impact level |
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
High |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Low |
|
|
|
|
05 |
04 |
03 |
02 |
01 |
1. |
Concern for economically
poor |
|
√ |
|
|
|
2. |
Concern for socially
backward |
|
√ |
|
|
|
3. |
Gender equality and fairness |
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Encouraging talent in schools in the zone |
|
√ |
|
|
|
5. |
Help in improving schools quality |
|
√ |
|
|
|
6. |
Fellowships instituted |
|
√ |
|
|
|
7. |
Fee waivers given |
|
√ |
|
|
|
8. |
Environmental concerns in neighborhood |
|
√ |
|
|
|
9. |
Support to NSS / NCC |
|
|
√ |
|
|
10. |
Rural development initiatives |
|
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
 |
Academic Results : 250 points: - Directly on % of Average Gross Intellectual |
|
Attainment per student using the following : Score = 2.50(15+x) where x= Av. Gross Intellectuals Attainment per student in % terms.
Exceptional |
: 90-100% |
|
Satisfactory |
: 40-50% |
√ |
Outstanding |
: 80-90% |
|
Marginal |
: 30-40% |
|
Excellent |
: 70-80% |
|
Low |
: 20-30% |
|
Very Good |
: 60-70% |
|
Very Low |
: 10-20% |
|
Good |
: 50-60% |
|
Unacceptable |
: 0-10% |
|
|
10. Placement Results*: 100 points: - Directly on % of campus placement
|
|
 |
10. Placement Results*: 100 points: - Directly on % of campus placement |
|
moderated by a factor given by "Average salary level/Industry average salary".
Exceptional |
: 90-100% |
|
Satisfactory |
: 40-50% |
|
Outstanding |
: 80-90% |
|
Marginal |
: 30-40% |
|
Excellent |
: 70-80% |
|
Low |
: 20-30% |
|
Very Good |
: 60-70% |
√ |
Very Low |
: 10-20% |
|
Good |
: 50-60% |
|
Unacceptable |
: 0-10% |
|
* For institutions where the batch has not yet graduated the weightage of this factor will be merged in factor 9 which will then be assessed out of 350 points instead of 250 points and score on factor 9 will be computed using the formula 3.5(15+x) where x is % Gross Av. Intellectual Attainment/student.
|
|